The latest projection is there for your viewing pleasure up on the top bar. Barack Obama extends his lead 3 more points, with the phantom poll in Montana pushing the Electoral Vote total to 309 to 229 in favor of Obama. In national polling, McCain continues to be statistically tied with Obama. The battleground states remain extremely close, but Obama has the advantage in most cases.
New feature for Insider Truths as of yesterday. Every thursday I will be posting a video to will range from either debates, hot topics, funny political videos etc. Right now, I have a video of people burning the American flag, and I'm intreasted to see your reation to the paticular subject.
Linkbar
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Election Junkie Pages:
Projection Pages:
Favorite Links:
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(78)
-
▼
July
(10)
- McCain Not in Bad Shape Yet, Obama Did What?
- Pelosi, Bush Battle
- Obama Extends Lead, New Insider Truths Feature
- John McCain Rising
- Projection Moved to Friday, New Insider Truths Arg...
- When asked about Obama's accomplishments...
- Next Projections, Insider Truths Update
- Happy Birthday America!
- New: Insider Truths
- New Projections are Here...
-
▼
July
(10)
4 comments:
Sen. Obama is not convincing voters
of his experience to lead a nation of 300 million persons. He is over in the Middle East and Europe; pretending he's the President - giving speeches on how to solve problems. (this would speak of his vague understanding there are problems without ever speaking to our President, on what those problems are; like it our not - there is a President and he's been actively involved to help persons in the middle east have freedom, at his own political risk while Sen. Obama chooses words carefully, always remembering
who's listening at home so as to look good for Obama. (who is really concerned with the middle east and problems?)Up until this point, Sen. Obama never visited the Middle East.
'talking it up' and 'actions' don't mesh.
Obama's voting:
>Rated 100% by the AU, indicating support of church-state separation. (Dec 2006)
action: told Evangelicals he is for "faith based programs" to help
people.
action: I am a person of faith; and I reach out to people of faith. (Apr 2008) He "reaches out"
to person's of faith; but in 2006
says "church and state" should be
'separate?' Obviously, Sen. Obama
doesn't know what 'church/state' separation actually means.
here's a goodie:
Obama words: 'I am a proud Christian who believes deeply in Jesus Christ.' (Jan 2008)
Would Christ who Obama believes deeply in:
> Vote AGAINST banning partial birth abortion (Sen. Obama did)
> Support Roe v. Wade? (Sen. Obama votes to support it)
> vote NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions? (Sen. Obama did) *hint:
Christ honored God, Father - who
commanded: "honor thy father and mother"
> Sen. Obama voted AGAINST John Roberts and Alito for the Supreme Court? Why? Is it because these folk have a 'pro life' record. Would CHRIST be against these justices who honor His Father's life.
on Patriotism:
I revere the American flag; I don't refuse to wear flag pins. (Apr 2008)
FactCheck: Yes, refused to wear a flag pin, last year. (Apr 2008)
voting record: NO on recommending Constitutional ban on flag desecration (can one revere the flag, yet not vote to SAY NO to those who DESECRATE it?)
as the saying goes: ACTIONS speak louder than "words."
Sen Obama also voted:
Voted NO on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)
Yet "in words" states he's against same sex marriage. [don't believe it]
Oh yes, on Obama ACTIONS of going to leaders in Iraq and suggeting
surge of troops to Afghanistan:
Obama words: PRESIDENT sets Iraq mission; Generals then implement tactics. (Apr 2008)
The President sets the mission in Iraq, but Sen. Obama is talking it up there as though he were the President. Obama has a number for
how many troops to send to Afghanistan, yet did not confer with any military.
Obama 'words' and 'actions' don't mesh.
Sen. Obama knows there is a problem in the middle east; and:
Obama rallies state Democrats, throws support behind Lieberman
By Stephanie Reitz, Associated Press Writer | March 31, 2006
HARTFORD, Conn. --U.S. Sen. Barack Obama rallied Connecticut Democrats at their annual dinner Thursday night, throwing his support behind mentor and Senate colleague Joe Lieberman.
(this is Lieberman who sides with our President on Iraq, though Obama HAS NEVER sided with our President on Iraq...Lieberman he
endorsed even with Leiberman's Iraq position...but NOT THE PRESIDENT of our nation) Get it
yet?
When Lieberman did not win the dem nod, and ran as an independent, Sen. Obama wrote and email support of the dem candidate Ned Lamont, though did not publicly appear for Mr. Lamont.
Does this speak of Sen. Obama's
ACTIONS of being purely PARTISAN
and not a UNITER of 300 million Americans. (democrat, republican, and independent)
How can one support the 'then' dem candidate for the Senate if that candidate was A SUPPORTER of THE WAR IN IRAQ...yet not SHOW SUPPORT of OUR PRESIDENT, who supports the war in Iraq. Is it because the President is Republican and Leiberman Democrat?
Is Obama an objective person or is he purely FOR democrats.
Sen. Obama seeks his own political agenda; and has not the experience of what it takes to lead a nation of 300 million person. TO LEAD not 'rule over' as a parent 'rules' over DEPENDENTS.
Sen. Obama, it would appear, does not yet understand what leadership means.
Post a Comment